Benefit

An Active Traffic Management System (ATM) on I-66 in Northern Virginia reduced total (all severity), multiple-vehicle (all severity), and rear-end (all severity) crashes, 6 percent, 10 percent, and 11 percent, respectively.

The Phase II Evaluation Report detailed the ATM strategies implemented and the corresponding safety evaluation.


10/01/2018


Summary Information

This Phase II project evaluated the performance of an Active Traffic Management System (ATM) system installed on I-66 in Northern Virginia. An operational analysis was conducted from October 2015 through November 2017 and a safety analysis was conducted from October 2015 through December 2016.

In early 2013, construction began on a Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) project to install an ATM system on I-66 from US 29 in Centreville to the Capital Beltway. Construction was completed in September 2015 and spanned approximately 12.4 miles. The primary ATM strategies implemented on I-66 included:
  • Variable Speed Limits (VSL): On I-66, the normal posted speed limit is 55 mi/h, but the VSL system can post speeds between 35 mi/h and 50 mi/h above each lane depending on traffic conditions.
  • Hard Shoulder Running (HSR): The I-66 HSR system dynamically opened or closed the shoulder lanes depending on roadway conditions.
  • Lane Use Control Signals (LUCS): For incident and work zone management, overhead gantries were deployed with LUCS to alert drivers to lane blockages.

METHODOLOGY

A segment-level analysis was performed to determine the segments that had benefitted the most from the implementation of the ATM system.

FINDINGS

The safety evaluation showed 6 percent, 10 percent, and 11 percent reductions in total (all severity), multiple-vehicle (all severity), and rear-end (all severity) crashes, respectively. Further analysis again demonstrated segments with HSR saw the largest safety improvements.

The operational analysis showed that travel time improved significantly during off-peak hours after the ATM system was activated but that travel time during peak periods in the peak direction of travel generally did not improve. Most of these improvements occurred on HSR segments.

Benefit Comments

No comments posted to date

Comment on this Benefit

To comment on this summary, fill in the information below and click on submit. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name and email address, if provided, will not be posted, but are to contact you, if needed to clarify your comments.



Source

Evaluation of the Impact of the I-66 Active Traffic Management System: Phase II

Author: Dutta, N., et al.

Published By: Virginia DOT

Source Date: 10/01/2018

Other Reference Number: VTRC 19-R7

URL: http://www.virginiadot.org/vtrc/main/online_reports/pdf/19-r7.pdf

Rating

Average User Rating

0 ( ratings)

Rate this Benefit

(click stars to rate)


Benefit ID: 2018-01336